Einstein’s Incompleteness/Nonlocality Dilemma

From the author’s abstract

In Felix’s words

After identifying in Part I a conceptual confusion, a Reality preconception, and a fallacious dichotomy, the famous EPR/EPRB argument for correlated “particles” is now studied in the light of the Ontic Probability Interpretation of Quantum Theory (QT/TOPI). Another Reality preconception is found, showing that EPR used and ignored QT predictions in a single paralogism. Employing the fallacious dichotomy and this second preconception, EPR unveiled a contradiction veiled in its premises. By removing nonlocality from QT’s Ontology by fiat, EPR preordained its incompleteness. The Petitio Principii fallacy was at work from the outset. Einstein surmised the proper solution to his incompleteness/nonlocality dilemma in 1949, but never abandoned his philosophical stance. It is concluded that there are no definitions of Reality: we have to accept that Reality may not conform to our prejudices and, if an otherwise successful theory predicts what we do not believe in, no gedankenexperiment will help because our biases may slither through. Only actual experiments could assist in solving Einstein’s dilemma, as has been proven in the last 50 years.

This is an excerpt for orientation. Read the linked PDF for the complete abstract, argument, references, and revision context.